Subscribe to CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s comprehensive analyses and high-level overviews, sign up for our everyday newsletter, and/or follow us on Google News!
Connecticut is situated in the heart of the nation’s most costly electric markets. Only Hawai’i and Rhode Island rank above it. The steep electricity prices are pushing Connecticut legislators to draft a bill aimed at reducing those rates. The catch is that concealed within the 80-page document are reductions in residential solar incentives and increases in renewable energy credits for nuclear power.
A hearing last month regarding the bill attracted Connecticut residents who commended the potential cost reductions — as well as individuals who criticized the risks that the amendments could pose to renewable energy.
Democratic Governor Ned Lamont urged lawmakers during the State of the State address in January to go beyond what he described as “superficial adjustments” to electricity generation and instead, adopt a blend of both renewable sources and fossil fuels to address Connecticut’s electricity generation dilemmas. “These exorbitant prices affect all of us: working families, seniors on fixed incomes, small enterprises, large manufacturers,” Lamont noted. “Everyone was furious looking at their bills after the hottest July in recorded history, and I can understand why.”
Connecticut residents incur approximately 15% higher costs in infrastructure and other associated fees, which are factored into the delivery segment of utility bills, compared to neighboring states. This delivery segment consists of various charges, including transmission and distribution fees, federally mandated congestion fees, and electric system enhancement charges, all contributing to elevate the overall electricity expense for Connecticut residents.
The proposed legislation includes:
- the establishment of an in-state procurement authority to monitor the power markets and acquire electricity at advantageous rates
- the removal of the sales tax on electricity purchased by commercial and industrial consumers
- the expansion of variable time-of-use rates, which encourages consumers to be mindful of when they utilize energy due to elevated rates during peak demand periods
Particularly alarming to renewable energy proponents is the classification of current nuclear energy production in the state as a Class I renewable energy source. If the existing Millstone Power Station were permitted to sell Class I RECs, it could do so at significantly lower prices than other clean energy sources because the nuclear facility is already operational without this additional financial backing, noted Francis Pullaro, president of renewable energy nonprofit RENEW Northeast, as reported by Canary Media.
There would also be minimal requirement for solar or wind RECs in the market if Millstone were allowed to trade credits. If approved, homeowners would obtain credit solely for the surplus power they produce. They would no longer be compensated for the distribution or transmission expenses, which are currently included in the compensation framework.
The Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee endorsed the bill in April. The next stage involves the Energy and Technology Committee reviewing it for additional evaluation and amendments.
The Dilemma With Connecticut’s Pipelines
Connecticut and its neighboring states primarily rely on natural gas supplied to power plants via a network of pipelines. These pipelines extend thousands of miles across various states before reaching New England. Yet, it’s not solely power plants that depend on these pipelines — they also provide heating for homes, gas stoves, hot water heaters, and local industries, all of which rely on the natural gas supply, too.
With such significant demand, prices escalate. It becomes even more severe during the winter months, which drives demand for gas even higher. Pipelines are pushed to their maximum capacity. Older “peaker” plants offer some assistance, but they are only efficient for brief periods and utilize fuel oil.
All these factors contribute to driving up Connecticut’s electricity costs.
“It’s New England, the end of the pipeline, more than anything else,” stated state Senator Norm Needleman, (D-Essex), who co-chairs the Energy and Technology Committee. “I believe we’re attempting to optimize a situation that has little flexibility.” Lacking abundant resources for hydroelectric, wind, or solar power or fossil fuels, New England cannot temper its high electricity costs as other regions in the US can.
As John Moritz elaborated on the CT Mirror, states like Connecticut have instructed their utilities to enter into extensive power purchase agreements at fixed rates, rather than dealing with the variable prices seen on wholesale energy markets. This approach simplifies cost coverage for developers and promotes carbon-free power.
Lawmakers and industry specialists agree that introducing new generation sources can enhance competition and diminish the steep electricity costs throughout New England. Ironically, however, in the latter months of 2024, Connecticut officials opted not to engage in any new purchasing agreements with offshore wind projects to avoid public pressure regarding the potential costs to ratepayers.
Offshore Wind May Reduce Electricity Expenses
The Connecticut Wind Collaborative represents stakeholders advocating for the supply chain development of the domestic offshore wind sector. The Atlantic coast is ideally suited for the initiation of the US offshore wind industry, thanks to relatively shallow coastal waters, numerous energy-hungry coastal communities nearby, and plentiful seaport resources. However, harnessing that energy necessitates the construction of massive turbines and transmission lines to bring the electricity ashore.
The inaugural wind farm catering to Connecticut, Revolution Wind, is slated to become operational sometime in 2026, with an estimated expenditure of about $1.5 billion. Revolution Wind marks the first multi-state offshore wind project in the US. Construction is currently underway, with updates available weekly online.
The project will yield enough clean energy — 704 MW of offshore wind energy — to power over 350,000 Connecticut and Rhode Island households and circumvent, by eliminating future emissions, more than one million metric tons of carbon pollution.
Offshore wind is becoming an increasingly cost-effective form of clean energy that stabilizes energy prices for consumers, according to the Revolution Wind website. It will aid in alleviating New England’s winter price spikes, specifically by diversifying the energy portfolio and decreasing reliance on natural gas.
Both the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission and the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority have ratified 20-year power purchase agreements with local utilities for the initiative.
Regardless of whether you utilize solar energy or not, please participate in our latest solar power survey.
Have a suggestion for CleanTechnica? Looking to advertise? Want to propose a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Enroll in our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories each day. Alternatively, sign up for our weekly newsletter on top stories of the week if daily updates are too frequent.
CleanTechnica employs affiliate links. Review our policy here.
CleanTechnica’s Comment Policy
