Bertrand, O., Dominguez, F., Duron, L., Girard, C. & & Zanette, J. Numerical modelling of vertical-axis and also transverse-flow hydrokinetic generator in the river Loire. In Process of the 36th IAHR Globe Congress (IAHR, 2015); https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2660.1688.
Münch-Alligné, C. et al. Speculative analysis of a brand-new kinetic generator efficiency for synthetic networks. Water 10, 311 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Khan, M. J., Bhuyan, G., Iqbal, M. T. & & Quaicoe, J. E. Hydrokinetic power conversion systems and also analysis of upright and also straight axis generators for river and also tidal applications: an innovation condition testimonial. Appl. Power 86, 1823– 1835 (2009 ).
Google Scholar.
Regulations, N. D. & & Epps, B. P. Hydrokinetic power conversion: expectation, innovation, and also study. Restore. Maintain. Power Rev. 57, 1245– 1259 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Bahaj, A. S., Molland, A. F., Chaplin, J. R. & & Batten, W. M. J. Power and also propelled dimensions of aquatic present generators under numerous hydrodynamic circulation problems in a cavitation passage and also a towing container. Restore. Power 32, 407– 426 (2007 ).
Google Scholar.
Kang, S., Borazjani, I., Colby, J. A. & & Sotiropoulos, F. Numerical simulation of 3D circulation past a real-life aquatic hydrokinetic generator. Adv. Water Resour. 39, 33– 43 (2012 ).
Google Scholar.
Chamorro, L. P. et al. On the communication in between a rough open network circulation and also an axial-flow generator. J. Liquid Mech. 716, 658– 670 (2013 ).
Google Scholar.
Kolekar, N. & & Banerjee, A. Efficiency characterization and also positioning of an aquatic hydrokinetic generator in a tidal network under limit closeness and also clog results. Appl. Power 148, 121– 133 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Kirke, B. K. Examinations on bare and also ducted helical and also straight blade Darrieus hydrokinetic generators. Restore. Power 36, 3013– 3022 (2011 ).
Google Scholar.
Bachant, P. & & Wosnik, M. Efficiency dimensions of round- and also spherical-helical cross-flow aquatic hydrokinetic generators, with quotes of exergy effectiveness. Restore. Power 74, 318– 325 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Bachant, P. & & Wosnik, M. Characterising the near-wake of a cross-flow generator. J. Turbul. 16, 392– 410 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Strom, B., Brunton, S. L. & & Polagye, B. Intracycle angular speed control of cross-flow generators. Nat. Power 2, 17103 (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
Richter, B. D. & & Thomas, G. A. Improving ecological circulations by customizing dam procedures. Ecol. Soc. 12, 12 (2007 ).
Google Scholar.
Latrubesse, E. M. et al. Clogging the rivers of the Amazon.com container. Nature 546, 363– 369 (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
National Renewable Resource Lab (NREL). MHK Atlas. https://maps.nrel.gov/mhk-atlas/ (accessed 4 December 2017).
Boehlert, G. W. & & Gill, A. B. Environmental and also environmental results of sea renewable resource advancement: a present synthesis. Oceanography 23, 68– 81 (2010 ).
Google Scholar.
Roche, R. C. et al. Research study concerns for analyzing possible effects of arising aquatic renewable resource innovations: understandings from advancements in Wales (UK). Restore. Power 99, 1327– 1341 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Copping, A. et al. Annex IV 2016 State of the Scientific Research Record: Environmental Results of Marine Renewable Resource Advancement Worldwide (United States DOE, IEA-OES, 2016); https://tethys.pnnl.gov/publications/state-of-the-science-2016.
Verdant Power Ceremony Job https://www.verdantpower.com/rite (accessed 4 December 2017).
Gunawan, B., Neary, V. S. & & Colby, J. A. Tidal power website source analysis in the East River tidal strait, near Roosevelt Island, New York City, New York City. Restore. Power 71, 509– 517 (2014 ).
Google Scholar.
Chawdhary, S. et al. Wake attributes of a TriFrame of axial-flow hydrokinetic generators. Restore. Power 109, 332– 345 (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
Neary, V. S. et al. Area Dimensions at Rivers and also Tidal Current Sites for Hydrokinetic Power Advancement: Finest Practices Guidebook (Oak Ridge National Lab, 2011).
Neary, V. S., Gunawan, B. & & Sale, D. C. Stormy inflow attributes for hydrokinetic power conversion in rivers. Restore. Maintain. Power Rev. 26, 437– 445 (2013 ).
Google Scholar.
Jacobson, P. Analysis and also Mapping of the Riverine Hydrokinetic Source in the Continental United State s. (United States Division of Power, Workplace of Scientific and also Technical Details, 2012); https://doi.org/10.2172/1219876.
Riglin, J., Daskiran, C., Jonas, J., Schleicher, W. C. & & Oztekin, A. Hydrokinetic generator range attributes for river applications and also spatially limited circulations. Restore. Power 97, 274– 283 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Power, M. E., Dietrich, W. E. & & Finlay, J. C. Dams and also downstream marine biodiversity: possible food internet repercussions of geomorphic and also hydrologic modification. Environ. Manag. 20, 887– 895 (1996 ).
Google Scholar.
Nittrouer, J. A., Allison, M. A. & & Campanella, R. Bedform transportation prices for the lowermost Mississippi River. J. Geophys. Res. Planet Browse. 113, 1– 16 (2008 ).
Google Scholar.
Hillside, C., Musa, M., Chamorro, L. P., Ellis, C. & & Guala, M. Resident comb around a design hydrokinetic generator in an erodible network. J. Hydraul. Eng. 140, 04014037 (2014 ).
Google Scholar.
Neill, S. P., Litt, E. J., Sofa, S. J. & & Davies, A. G. The influence of tidal stream generators on large debris characteristics. Restore. Power 34, 2803– 2812 (2009 ).
Google Scholar.
Neill, S. P., Jordan, J. R. & & Sofa, S. J. Effect of tidal power converter (TEC) ranges on the characteristics of cliff sand financial institutions. Restore. Power 37, 387– 397 (2012 ).
Google Scholar.
Fairley, I., Masters, I. & & Karunarathna, H. The advancing influence of tidal stream generator ranges on debris transportation in the Pentland Firth. Restore. Power 80, 755– 769 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Neill, S. P., Robins, P. E. & & Fairley, I. The influence of aquatic renewable resource removal on debris characteristics. In Marine Renewable Resource: Source Characterization and also Physical Impact s (eds Yang, Z. & & Copping, A.) 279– 304 (Springer, Cham, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53536-4_12.
Google Scholar.
Hillside, C., Musa, M. & & Guala, M. Communication in between instream axial circulation hydrokinetic generators and also uni-directional circulation bedforms. Restore. Power 86, 409– 421 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Hillside, C., Kozarek, J., Sotiropoulos, F. & & Guala, M. Hydrodynamics and also debris transportation in ameandering network with amodel axial-flow hydrokinetic generator. Water Resour. Res. 52, 860– 879 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Yang, X., Khosronejad, A. & & Sotiropoulos, F. Large-eddy simulation of a hydrokinetic generator installed on an erodible bed. Restore. Power 113, 1419– 1433 (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
Musa, M., Hillside, C. & & Guala, M. Resident and also non-local results of spanwise limited perturbations in erodible river bathymetries. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc 60, abstr. R29.005 (2015 ).
Leopold, L. B. & & Wolman, M. G. River Network Patterns: Braided, Meandering, and also Straight (United States Federal Government Printing Workplace, 1957).
Callander, R. A. Instability and also river networks. J. Liquid Mech. 36, 465– 480 (1969 ).
Google Scholar.
Ikeda, S., Parker, G. & & Sawai, K. Bend concept of river twists. Component 1. Straight advancement. J. Liquid Mech. 112, 363 (1981 ).
Google Scholar.
Blondeaux, P. & & Seminara, G. A unified bar– bend concept of river twists. J. Liquid Mech. 157, 449 (1985 ).
Google Scholar.
Tubino, M. & & Seminara, G. Free– forced communications in establishing twists and also reductions of complimentary bars. J. Liquid Mech. 214, 131– 159 (1990 ).
Google Scholar.
Zolezzi, G. & & Seminara, G. Upstream and also downstream impact in river twisting. Component 1. General concept and also application to overdeepening. J. Liquid Mech. 438, 183– 211 (2001 ).
Google Scholar.
Struiksma, N. & & Crosato, A. Evaluation of a 2-D bed topography design for rivers. In River Twisting Vol. 12 (eds Ikeda, S. & & Parker, G. )153– 180 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1989).
Nittrouer, J. A., Mohrig, D. & & Allison, M. A. Punctuated sand transportation in the lowermost Mississippi River. J. Geophys. Res. Planet Browse. 116, 1– 24 (2011 ).
Google Scholar.
Neary, V. S., Gunawan, B., Hillside, C. & & Chamorro, L. P. Far and wide area circulation disruptions caused by design hydrokinetic generator: ADV and also ADP contrast. Restore. Power 60, 1– 6 (2013 ).
Google Scholar.
Hillside, C. Communications In Between Network Topography and also Hydrokinetic Turbines: Debris Transportation, Wind Turbine Efficiency, and also Wake Qualities. PhD thesis, College of Minnesota (2015 ).
Stevens, R. J. A. M., Gayme, D. F. & & Meneveau, C. Impacts of generator spacing on the power result of extensive wind-farms. Wind Power 19, 359– 370 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Meneveau, C. The top-down design of wind ranch limit layers and also its applications. J. Turbul. 13, 1– 12 (2012 ).
Google Scholar.
Chamorro, L. P., Arndt, R. E. A. & & Sotiropoulos, F. Stormy circulation buildings around a staggered wind ranch. Bound.-Layer. Meteorol. 141, 349– 367 (2011 ).
Google Scholar.
Garrett, C. & & Cummins, P. The effectiveness of a wind turbine in a tidal network. J. Liquid Mech. 588, 243– 251 (2007 ).
Google Scholar.
Vennell, R. Adjusting tidal generators in-concert to increase ranch effectiveness. J. Liquid Mech. 671, 587– 604 (2011 ).
Google Scholar.
Vennell, R., Funke, S. W., Draper, S., Stevens, C. & & Divett, T. Creating huge ranges of tidal generators: a synthesis and also testimonial. Restore. Maintain. Power Rev. 41, 454– 472 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Chen, L. & & Lam, W. H. Slipstream in between aquatic present generator and also seabed. Power 68, 801– 810 (2014 ).
Google Scholar.
Musa, M., Heisel, M. & & Guala, M. Predictive design for neighborhood comb downstream of hydrokinetic generators in erodible networks. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 024606 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Seminara, G. Fluvial sedimentary patterns. Annu. Rev. Liquid Mech. 42, 43– 66 (2010 ).
Google Scholar.
Chen, L. & & Lam, W. H. Techniques for forecasting seabed comb around aquatic present generator. Restore. Maintain. Power Rev. 29, 683– 692 (2014 ).
Google Scholar.
Chen, L., Hashim, R., Othman, F. & & Motamedi, S. Speculative research on comb account of pile-supported straight axis tidal present generator. Restore. Power 114, 744– 754 (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
Singh, A., Fienberg, K., Jerolmack, D. J., Marr, J. & & Foufoula-Georgiou, E. Speculative proof for analytical scaling and also intermittency in debris transportation prices. J. Geophys. Res. Planet Browse. 114, 1– 16 (2009 ).
Singh, A., Porté-Agel, F. & & Foufoula-georgiou, E. On the impact of crushed rock bed characteristics on speed power ranges. Water Resour. Res. 46, 1– 10 (2010 ).
Singh, A., Lanzoni, S., Wilcock, P. R. & & Foufoula-Georgiou, E. Multiscale analytical characterization of moving bed types in crushed rock and also sand bed rivers. Water Resour. Res. 47, 1– 26 (2011 ).
Google Scholar.
Howard, K. B., Hu, J. S., Chamorro, L. P. & & Guala, M. Identifying the reaction of a wind generator design under complicated inflow problems. Wind Power 18, 729– 743 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Wong, M. & & Parker, G. Reanalysis and also modification of bed-load connection of Meyer-Peter and also Müller utilizing their very own data source. J. Hydraul. Eng. 132, 1159– 1168 (2006 ).
Google Scholar.
