Bogdanov, D. et al. Radical change path in instructions of lasting electric power via transformative actions. Nat. Commun. 10, 1077. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08855-1 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
UNEP. Inexperienced Power Selections: The benefits, threats and also compromises of low-carbon used scientific researches for electric power production Record of the Worldwide Useful source Panel (2016 ).
United Nations. Remodeling our globe: The 2030 schedule for lasting development– A/RES/70/ 1. (2015 ).
Intergovernmental Panel on Neighborhood weather condition Adjustment. Globe Warming of 1.5 ° C. An IPCC Specific Record on the influences of globe warming of 1.5 ° C over pre-industrial arrays and also involved globe greenhouse gas discharge paths, within the context of enhancing the around the world action to the specter of neighborhood weather condition adjustment, lasting development, and also initiatives to get rid of hardship. (2018 ).
Gernaat, D. E. H. J., Bogaart, P. W., Vuuren, D. P. V., Biemans, H. & & Niessink, R. Excessive-resolution assessment of globe technological and also economic hydropower capacity. Nature Power 2, 821– 828. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0006-y (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
IEA. Hydropower (Paris, 2020).
Intergovernmental Panel on Neighborhood weather condition Adjustment. Hydropower. In IPCC Specific Record on Renewable Source Of Power and also Neighborhood weather condition Adjustment Reduction (2011 ).
Almeida, R. M. et al. Lowering greenhouse gas exhausts of Amazon.com hydropower with critical dam preparation. Nat. Commun. 10, 4281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12179-5 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Fuso Nerini, F. et al. Mapping harmonies and also compromises in between power and also the lasting development purposes. Nat. Power 3, 10– 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Muller, M. Hydropower dams will certainly aid reduce the around the world warming affect of marshes. Nature 566, 315– 317. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00616-w (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Pehl, M. et al. Recognizing future exhausts from low-carbon power strategies by combination of life-cycle assessment and also integrated power modelling. Nat. Power 2, 939– 945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0032-9 (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
Wu, H. et al. Outcomes of dam advancement on biodiversity: an examination. J. Clear. Prod. 221, 480– 489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.001 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Turgeon, Ok., Turpin, C., Gregory-Eaves, I. & & Lawler, J. Dams have numerous effect on fish areas throughout latitudes: a measurable synthesis. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1501– 1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13283 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Gracey, E. O. & & Verones, F. Impacts from hydropower production on biodiversity in an LCA structure– assessment and also propositions. Int. J. Life Process Assess. 21, 412– 428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1039-3 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Lehner, B. et al. Excessive-resolution mapping of the globe’s tanks and also dams for lasting river-flow management. Entry. Ecol. Environ. 9, 494– 502. https://doi.org/10.1890/100125 (2011 ).
Google Scholar.
Dorber, M., May, R. & & Verones, F. Modeling net land line of work of hydropower tanks in Norway to be utilized in life process assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 2375– 2384. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05125 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Strachan, I. B. et al. Does the development of a boreal hydroelectric storage tank end in a web adjustment in dissipation?. J. Hydrol. 540, 886– 899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.067 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Mekonnen, M. M. & & Hoekstra, A. Y. Heaven water impact of electric power from hydropower. Hydrol. Planet Syst. Sci. 16, 179– 187. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-179-2012 (2012 ).
Google Scholar.
Poff, N. L. & & Zimmerman, J. Ok. H. Ecological feedbacks to transformed action routines: a literary works assessment to inform the scientific research and also management of ecological circulations. Freshw. Biol. 55, 194– 205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x (2010 ).
Google Scholar.
Gillespie, B. R., Desmet, S., Kay, P., Tillotson, M. R. & & Brown, L. E. A crucial assessment of controlled river community feedbacks to taken care of ecological circulations from tanks. Freshw. Biol. 60, 410– 425. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12506 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
City, M. C. Accelerating termination threat from neighborhood weather condition adjustment. Scientific Research 348, 571– 573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4984 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Hermoso, V., Clavero, M. & & Inexperienced, A. J. Do not allow injury to marshes counteract the benefits of hydropower. Nature 568, 171– 171. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01140-7 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
McAllister, D. E., Craig, J. F., Davidson, N., Delany, S. & & Seddon, M. Biodiversity influences of massive dams. History Paper Nr. 1 – Ready for IUCN/UNEP/WCD (2001 ).
Lawbreaker, D. A. et al. Human outcomes on eco-friendly connection in water communities: Incorporating clinical strategies to help management and also reduction. Sci. Entire Environ. 534, 52– 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.034 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Alho, C. J. Environmental results of hydropower tanks on wild creatures and also freshwater turtles in Amazonia: an examination. Oecologia Australis 15, 593– 604 (2011 ).
Google Scholar.
Kitzes, J. & & Shirley, R. Estimating biodiversity influences with out subject studies: a situation study in north Borneo. Ambio 45, 110– 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0683-3 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Mace, G. M., Norris, Ok. & & Fitter, A. H. Biodiversity and also community suppliers: a multilayered connection. Tendencies Ecol. Evol. 27, 19– 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006 (2012 ).
Google Scholar.
Secretariat of the Meeting on Organic Range. Globe Biodiversity Overview 4. (Montreal, 2014).
Bennett, E. M. et al. Connecting biodiversity, community suppliers, and also human wellness: 3 obstacles for making evaluation for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Preserve. 14, 76– 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Opoku, A. Biodiversity and also the built environment: Effects for the lasting development purposes (SDGs). Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 141, 1– 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.011 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Blicharska, M. et al. Biodiversity’s payments to lasting development. Nat. Preserve. 2, 1083– 1093. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0417-9 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Winemiller, Ok. O. et al. Stabilizing hydropower and also biodiversity within the Amazon.com, Congo, and also Mekong. Scientific Research 351, 128– 129. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7082 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Nilsson, M., Griggs, D. & & Visbeck, M. Insurance coverage: map the communications in between lasting development purposes. Nature 534, 320– 322. https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Bhaduri, A. et al. Achieving lasting development purposes from a water viewpoint. Entry. Environ. Sci. 4, 64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00064 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Liu, J. et al. Nexus approaches to globe lasting development. Nat. Preserve. 1, 466– 476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0135-8 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Shin, S. et al. Extreme choice modeling of river-floodplain-reservoir inundation characteristics within the Mekong River Container. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2019WR026449. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr026449 (2020 ).
Google Scholar.
Schmitt, R. J. P., Bizzi, S., Castelletti, A. & & Kondolf, G. M. Improved compromises of hydropower and also sand connection by critical dam preparation within the Mekong. Nat. Preserve. 1, 96– 104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0022-3 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Pokhrel, Y., Shin, S., Lin, Z., Yamazaki, D. & & Qi, J. Prospective interruption of flooding characteristics within the Reduction Mekong River Container arising from upstream action guideline. Sci. Rep. 8, 17767. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35823-4 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Ashraf, F. B. et al. Modifications in short amount of time river action guideline and also hydropeaking in Nordic rivers. Sci. Rep. 8, 17232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35406-3 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Barbarossa, V. et al. Influences of existing and also future gigantic dams on the geographical differ connection of freshwater fish worldwide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 3648. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912776117 (2020 ).
Google Scholar.
Scherer, L. & & Pfister, S. Hydropower’s biogenic carbon impact. PLoS ONE 11, e0161947. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161947 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Scherer, L. & & Pfister, S. Globe water impact assessment of hydropower. Restore. Power 99, 711– 720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.021 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Evans, A., Strezov, V. & & Evans, T. J. Examination of sustainability indications for eco-friendly power used scientific researches. Restore. Preserve. Power Rev. 13, 1082– 1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008 (2009 ).
Google Scholar.
Laborde, A., Habits, E., Link, O. & & Kemp, P. Strategic technique to establish concerns for lasting hydropower development in a biodiversity hotspot. Sci. Entire Environ. 714, 136735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136735 (2020 ).
Google Scholar.
Haga, C. et al. Circumstance assessment of eco-friendly energy-biodiversity nexuses making use of a woodland scenic view mannequin. Entry. Ecol. Evol. 8, 155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00155 (2020 ).
Google Scholar.
Zarfl, C. et al. Future gigantic hydropower dams influence globe freshwater megafauna. Sci. Rep. 9, 18531. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54980-8 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Gibon, T., Hertwich, E. G., Arvesen, A., Singh, B. & & Verones, F. Well being benefits, eco-friendly hazards of low-carbon electric power. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 034023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6047 (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
Mu, Q., Zhao, M. & & Operating, S. W. Enhancements to a MODIS globe earthbound evapotranspiration formula. Far-off Sens. Environ. 115, 1781– 1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019 (2011 ).
Google Scholar.
Fick, S. E. & & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: brand-new 1-km spatial choice neighborhood weather condition surface areas for globe acreage. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302– 4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086 (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
Dorber, M., Mattson, Ok. R., Sandlund, O. T., May, R. & & Verones, F. Quantifying net water intake of Norwegian hydropower tanks and also connected water biodiversity influences in life process assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 76, 36– 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.12.002 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Verones, F. et al. LCIA structure and also cross-cutting factors guiding throughout the UNEP-SETAC Life Process Effort. J. Clear. Prod. 161, 957– 967 (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. & & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for preservation concerns. Nature 403, 853– 858 (2000 ).
Google Scholar.
Essential Environment Collaboration Fund. Biodiversity Hotspot Shapefile. https://www.cepf.internet/our-work/biodiversity-hotspots/hotspots-defined (2016 ).
Le Blanc, D. Towards combination at some point? The lasting development purposes as a neighborhood of targets. Maintain. Dev. 23, 176– 187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Mutel, C. et al. Summary and also propositions for regionalized life process influence assessment. Int. J. Life Process Assess. 24, 856– 865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1539-4 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Popescu, V. D. et al. Measuring biodiversity compromises within the face of extensive eco-friendly and also unique power development. Sci. Rep. 10, 7603. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64501-7 (2020 ).
Google Scholar.
Oliver, T. H. Just how a whole lot biodiversity loss is an extreme quantity of?. Scientific Research 353, 220. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag1712 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Pereira, H. M., Navarro, L. M. & & Martins, I. S. Globe biodiversity adjustment: the harmful, the wonderful, and also the unidentified. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37, 25– 50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042911-093511 (2012 ).
Google Scholar.
Best, J. Anthropogenic worries on the globe’s big rivers. Nat. Geosci. 12, 7– 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0262-x (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Newbold, T. et al. Has land usage pressed earthbound biodiversity past the global limit? A globally assessment. Scientific Research 353, 288. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2201 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Eloranta, A. P., Finstad, A. G., Helland, I. P., Ugedal, O. & & Power, M. Hydropower effect on storage tank fish populaces are changed by ecological variant. Sci. Entire Environ. 618, 313– 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.268 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Worrall, T. P. et al. The recognition of hydrological indices for the characterization of macroinvertebrate team action to relocate regimen irregularity. Hydrol. Sci. J. 59, 645– 658. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.825722 (2014 ).
Google Scholar.
Holt, C. R., Pfitzer, D., Scalley, C., Caldwell, B. A. & & Batzer, D. P. Macroinvertebrate team feedbacks to yearly action variant from river guideline: an 11-year study. River Res. Appl. 31, 798– 807. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2782 (2015 ).
Google Scholar.
Worldwide Organisation for Standardization. ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management– Life process assessment– Policies and also structure (2006 ).
Jolliet, O. et al. Globe guiding on ecological life process influence assessment indications: influences of neighborhood weather condition adjustment, favorable particle issue development, water intake and also land usage. Int. J. Life Process Assess 23, 2189– 2207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1443-y (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Hirsch, P. E., Schillinger, S., Weigt, H. & & Burkhardt-Holm, P. A hydro-economic mannequin for water level changes: integrating limnology with business economics for lasting development of hydropower. PLoS ONE 9, e114889– e114889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114889 (2014 ).
Google Scholar.
Gagnon, L., Bélanger, C. & & Uchiyama, Y. Life-cycle assessment of electric power age selections: the standing of evaluation in year 2001. Power Protection 30, 1267– 1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4215( 02 )00088-5 (2002 ).
Google Scholar.
George, M. W., Hotchkiss, R. H. & & Huffaker, R. Storage tank sustainability and also debris management. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/( asce) wr.1943-5452.0000720 (2017 ).
Google Scholar.
Yüksel, I. Hydropower for lasting water and also power development. Restore. Preserve. Power Rev. 14, 462– 469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.025 (2010 ).
Google Scholar.
Hertwich, E. G. Dealing with biogenic greenhouse gas exhausts from hydropower in LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 9604– 9611. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401820p (2013 ).
Google Scholar.
Bakken, T. H., Modahl, I. S., Raadal, H. L., Bustos, A. A. & & Arnoy, S. Allotment of water intake in multi-purpose tanks. Water Protection 18, 932– 947. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2016.009 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Hanafiah, M. M., Xenopoulos, M. A., Pfister, S., Leuven, R. S. E. W. & & Huijbregts, M. A. J. Characterization elements for water intake and also greenhouse gas exhausts based mainly on freshwater fish types termination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 5272– 5278. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1039634 (2011 ).
Google Scholar.
Tendall, D. M., Hellweg, S., Pfister, S., Huijbregts, M. A. J. & & Gaillard, G. Impacts of river water intake on water biodiversity in life process assessment– a suggested technique, and also a situation study for Europe. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 3236– 3244. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4048686 (2014 ).
Google Scholar.
Wang, J. et al. Analyzing the water and also carbon impact of hydropower terminals at an across the country range. Sci. Entire Environ. 676, 595– 612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.148 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
Bakken, T. H., Modahl, I. S., Engeland, Ok., Raadal, H. L. & & Arnøy, S. The life-cycle water impact of 2 hydropower jobs in Norway. J. Clear. Prod. 113, 241– 250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.036 (2016 ).
Google Scholar.
Track, C., Gardner, Ok. H., Klein, S. J. W., Souza, S. P. & & Mo, W. Cradle-to-grave greenhouse gas exhausts from dams in the United States of America. Restore. Preserve. Power Rev. 90, 945– 956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.014 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Aung, T. S., Fischer, T. B. & & Azmi, A. S. Are massive dams eco destructive? Life-cycle ecological charges of mega-hydropower plants in Myanmar. Int. J. Life Process Assess. 25, 1749– 1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01795-9 (2020 ).
Google Scholar.
Moran, E. F., Lopez, M. C., Moore, N., Müller, N. & & Hyndman, D. W. Lasting hydropower within the twenty very first century. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 11891. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809426115 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
United Country Environmental Program. Unskilled power choices: The benefits, threats, and also compromises of low-carbon used scientific researches for electric power production. (2016 ).
Edenhofer, O. et al. IPCC specific record on eco-friendly source of power and also neighborhood weather condition adjustment reduction. (All Set By Functioning Team III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Neighborhood weather condition Adjustment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011).
Laranjeiro, T., May, R. & & Verones, F. Impacts of onshore wind power production on birds and also bats: tips for future life cycle influence assessment advancements. Int. J. Life Process Assess 23, 2007– 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1434-4 (2018 ).
Google Scholar.
Bakken, T. H., Killingtveit, Å., Engeland, Ok., Alfredsen, Ok. & & Harby, A. Water intake from hydropower plants– assessment of published price quotes and also an examination of the suggestion. Hydrol. Planet Syst. Sci. 17, 3983– 4000. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013 (2013 ).
Google Scholar.
Dorber, M., Kuipers, Ok. & & Verones, F. Globe characterization elements for earthbound biodiversity influences of future land inundation in life process assessment. Sci. Entire Environ. 712, 134582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134582 (2020 ).
Google Scholar.
Olson, D. M. et al. Earthbound ecoregions of the globe: a brand-new map of life in the world. Bioscience 51, 933. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568( 2001 )051[0933:teotwa] 2.0. carbon monoxide; 2 (2001 ).
Google Scholar.
Kuipers, Ok. J. J., Hellweg, S. & & Verones, F. Prospective charges of local types loss for globe types splendor: a measurable technique for approximating globe termination opportunities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 4728– 4738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06173 (2019 ).
Google Scholar.
University of Montana. MODIS Globe Evapotranspiration Obstacle (MOD16), http://www.ntsg.umt.edu/undertaking/modis/mod16.php.
Mu, Q., Heinsch, F. A., Zhao, M. & & Operating, S. W. Development of a globally evapotranspiration formula based mainly on MODIS and also globe weather forecasting details. Far-off Sens. Environ. 111, 519– 536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015 (2007 ).
Google Scholar.
Xenopoulos, M. A. & & Lodge, D. M. Selecting the action: making use of species-discharge partnerships to anticipate losses in fish biodiversity. Ecology 87, 1907– 1914. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658( 2006 )87[1907:gwtfus] 2.0. carbon monoxide; 2 (2006 ).
Google Scholar.
Abell, R. et al. Freshwater ecoregions of the globe: a brand-new map of biogeographic versions for freshwater biodiversity preservation. BioScience 58( 5 ), 403– 414 (2008 ).
Google Scholar.
Myhre, G. et al. In: Neighborhood weather condition Adjustment 2013: The Bodily Scientific Research Structure. Payment of Working Team I to the 5th Examination Record of the Intergovernmental Panel on Neighborhood weather condition Adjustment. (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Verones, F. et al. LC-IMPACT: A regionalized life process injury assessment technique. J. Ind. Ecol. 24, 1201– 1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13018 (2020 ).
Google Scholar.
Thematic Mapping API. Globe Borders Dataset http://thematicmapping.org/downloads/world_borders.php (2009 ).
ESRI. ArcGis Desktop Computer– ArcMap Design 10.8 https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/ (2020 ).