As per a recent global investigation, dedicating merely 1% of the worldwide offshore wind expenditure—forecasted to hit USD 6 trillion (roughly EUR 5.1 trillion) by 2050—to marine protection and rejuvenation could enable the revitalization of millions of square kilometers of oceanic ecosystems.
The research collective, spearheaded by The Rich North Sea initiative and the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), has urged governments to adopt regulatory actions, such as licensing stipulations or non-monetary criteria in tendering processes, mandating a stipulated fraction of project funds be directed toward marine biodiversity efforts.
The analysis emphasizes that pivotal global biodiversity objectives, including the United Nations aim to restore 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030, are jeopardized due to inadequate financing and a deficiency in political resolve.
With current nature enhancement initiatives in offshore wind and recent tenders promoting integrated nature-inclusive offshore wind advancements, the authors highlight that the sector is strategically positioned to spearhead both climate action and extensive marine ecosystem rejuvenation.
“Offshore wind offers a distinctive chance to facilitate the energy transition while simultaneously being the first marine sector to yield a net-positive effect on ecosystem rehabilitation,” remarked Christiaan van Sluis, the main author of the investigation.
Van Sluis emphasized that reversing biodiversity depletion can be accomplished with a relatively minor segment of total investments if smart biodiversity mandates are incorporated into offshore wind licensing and tendering processes at this juncture.
The writers observe that investments targeted toward broader marine biodiversity aims are seldom required by governments, despite offshore wind licensing fees and non-financial bidding criteria being part of site and project allocation methodologies.
“A notable instance is the Dutch nature-inclusive tender for the Hollandse Kust West area VI, which mandated offshore wind farm (OWF) consortia to contribute within the allocated OWF vicinity. Implementing licensing conditions that link OWFs to proactive and passive restoration actions, both inside and beyond OWF zones, could significantly bolster marine life rehabilitation through expansive initiatives. This combined strategy would tackle both climate and biodiversity challenges while guaranteeing that marine restoration evolves in line with renewable energy growth,” the study asserts.
The writers indicate that nations such as the Netherlands, Denmark, and the UK already have centralized tendering frameworks well-equipped for integrating biodiversity conditions.
“A unified international endeavor with legally enforceable regulations would create economies of scale, guarantee fair competition, and shield marine ecosystems from the dangers of price-driven decision-making,” asserted The Rich North Sea in a press announcement dated July 7.
“The integration of non-monetary criteria in tenders has been effectively applied in multiple Dutch initiatives. The moment is ripe to amplify marine restoration as offshore wind projects are initiated globally,” observed Karen Vennik, Commercial Director of Offshore Energy and Ocean Health at Van Oord, a participant in the construction of the Ecowende offshore wind farm.
The study discovered that centralized tendering and leasing structures in these nations are beneficial for securing commitments from both governmental and developmental bodies to finance and carry out marine restoration projects.
The authors scrutinized the tendering, licensing, and leasing protocols in the Netherlands, Denmark, and the UK, concluding that setting aside 1% to 5% of offshore wind investments for nature restoration through these countries’ offshore wind ventures is practical.
“This allocation can be accomplished by redistributing resources from financial bids, weaving biodiversity criteria into tendering procedures, or channeling contributions through OWF leasing costs in centralized licensing systems. Nature-inclusive frameworks may also be financed by operators through the integration of these requisites into site selection,” the investigation notes.
“Nonetheless, allocating a greater percentage could incite competition with other non-monetary criteria and possibly clash with alternative sustainability aims. Hence, financing for marine restoration should stem from a balanced amalgamation of government provisions, blue and green bonds, private operator funding, and cost efficiencies from a centralized model.”
SUMMER SALE: Up to 50% off on advertising on offshoreWIND.biz
offshoreWIND.biz is read by thousands of offshore wind professionals daily. Secure your advertising space by July 31 and avail up to 50% off!
Follow offshoreWIND.biz on:
