UNEP. Why does energy matter? UN Environment Program. (2023).
Energy Institute. Statistical Review of World Energy. (2024). https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review
Ritchie, H. & Rosado, P. Electricity Mix. ourworldindata.org (2020). https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix
Pracheil, B. M., DeRolph, C. R., Schramm, M. P. & Bevelhimer, M. S. A fish-eye view of riverine hydropower systems: the current understanding of the biological response to turbine passage. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 26, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-015-9416-8
Piper, A. T., Rosewarne, P. J., Wright, R. M. & Kemp, P. S. The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river. Ecol. Eng. 118, 31–42 (2018).
van Treeck, R., Radinger, J., Noble, R. A. A., Geiger, F. & Wolter, C. The European Fish Hazard Index – An assessment tool for screening hazard of hydropower plants for fish. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 43, 100903 (2021).
Winemiller, K. O. et al. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Sci. 351, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7082
Dainys, J., Stakėnas, S., Gorfine, H. & Ložys, L. Mortality of silver eels migrating through different types of hydropower turbines in Lithuania. River Res. Appl. 34, 52–59 (2018).
Couto, T. B. A., Messager, M. L. & Olden, J. D. Safeguarding migratory fish via strategic planning of future small hydropower in Brazil. Nat. Sustain. 4, 409–416 (2021).
Van Els, R. H. & Junior, A. C. P. B. The Brazilian Experience with Hydrokinetic Turbines. Energy Procedia 75, 259–264 (2015).
Chaudhari, S. et al. In-stream turbines for rethinking hydropower development in the Amazon basin. Nat. Sustain. 4, 680–687 (2021).
Salleh, M. B., Kamaruddin, N. M. & Mohamed-Kassim, Z. Savonius hydrokinetic turbines for a sustainable river-based energy extraction: A review of the technology and potential applications in Malaysia. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2019.100554 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tan, K. W., Kirke, B. & Anyi, M. Small-scale hydrokinetic turbines for remote community electrification. Energy Sustain. Dev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.05.005 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wee, T. K., Anyi, M. & Song, N. S. Small-Scale Horizontal Axis Hydrokinetic Turbine as Alternative for Remote Community Electrification in Sarawak. in 2020 8th International Conference on Smart Grid and Clean Energy Technologies, ICSGCE 2020. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGCE49177.2020.9275631
Bakar, N. A. A., Shamsuddin, M. S. M. & Kamaruddin, N. M. Experimental Study of a Hybrid Turbine for Hydrokinetic Applications on Small Rivers in Malaysia. J. Adv. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 28, 318–384 (2022).
Kirke, B. Small hydrokinetic turbines. In Small Wind and Hydrokinetic Turbines 39–69 (Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1049/pbpo169e_ch3.
Google Scholar
Small Wind and Hydrokinetic Turbines. Small Wind Hydrokinetic Turbines doi:https://doi.org/10.1049/pbpo169e. (2021).
Google Scholar
Anyi, M. & Kirke, B. Evaluation of small axial flow hydrokinetic turbines for remote communities. Energy for Sustain. Dev. 14, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2010.02.003
Musa, M., Hill, C., Sotiropoulos, F. & Guala, M. Performance and resilience of hydrokinetic turbine arrays under large migrating fluvial bedforms. Nat. Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0218-9 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bender, A. et al. Imaging-sonar observations of salmonid interactions with a vertical axis instream turbine. River Res. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4171 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ouro, P., Runge, S., Luo, Q. & Stoesser, T. Three-dimensionality of the wake recovery behind a vertical axis turbine. Renew. Energy 133, 1066–1077 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lundin, S. et al. Experimental demonstration of performance of a vertical axis marine current turbine in a river. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4971817 (2016).
Google Scholar
Guerra, M. & Thomson, J. Wake measurements from a hydrokinetic river turbine. Renew. Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.052 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ouro, P. & Stoesser, T. Wake Generated Downstream of a Vertical Axis Tidal Turbine. in 12th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC) (2017).
Posa, A. Dependence of the wake recovery downstream of a vertical axis wind turbine on its dynamic solidity. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104212 (2020).
Google Scholar
Posa, A. Wake characterization of coupled configurations of vertical axis wind turbines using Large Eddy Simulation. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.11.008 (2019).
Google Scholar
Müller, S., Muhawenimana, V., Wilson, C. A. M. E. & Ouro, P. Experimental investigation of the wake characteristics behind twin vertical axis turbines. Energy Convers. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114768 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schweizer, P. E., Cada, G. F. & Bevelhimer, M. S. Estimation of the Risks of Collision or Strike to Freshwater Aquatic Organisms Resulting from Operation of Instream Hydrokinetic Turbines (Prepared for the Wind and Water Power Program Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy, 2011).
Amaral, S., Perkins, N., Giza, D. & McMahon, B. Evaluation of Fish Injury and Mortality Associated with Hydrokinetic Turbines. Manager (2011).
Amaral, S. V. et al. Evaluation of behavior and survival of fish exposed to an axial-flow hydrokinetic turbine. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/02755947.2014.982333 (2015).
Google Scholar
Müller, S. et al. Fish response to the presence of hydrokinetic turbines as a sustainable energy solution. Sci. Rep. 13, 7459 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yoshida, T. et al. Experimental study of fish behavior near a tidal turbine model under dark conditions. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-021-00850-w (2022).
Google Scholar
Berry, M., Sundberg, J. & Francisco, F. Salmonid response to a vertical axis hydrokinetic turbine in a stream aquarium. in Proceedings of the 13th European Wave and Tidal Energy ConferenceNaples, Italy, (2019).
Viehman, H. A. & Zydlewski, G. B. Fish interactions with a commercial-scale tidal energy device in the natural environment. Estuaries Coasts https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9767-8 (2014).
Google Scholar
Fraser, S., Williamson, B. J., Nikora, V. & Scott, B. E. Fish distributions in a tidal channel indicate the behavioural impact of a marine renewable energy installation. Energy Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.01.008 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lieber, L., Nimmo-Smith, W. A. M., Waggitt, J. J. & Kregting, L. Localised anthropogenic wake generates a predictable foraging hotspot for top predators. Commun. Biol. 2, 123 (2019).
Sonnino Sorisio, G., Müller, S., Wilson, C. A. M. E., Ouro, P. & Cable, J. Colour as a behavioural guide for fish near hydrokinetic turbines. Heliyon, e22376 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22376
Zhang, J., Kitazawa, D., Taya, S. & Mizukami, Y. Impact assessment of marine current turbines on fish behavior using an experimental approach based on the similarity law. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. (Japan) 22, (2017).
Castro-Santos, T. & Haro, A. Survival and Behavioral Effects of Exposure to a Hydrokinetic Turbine on Juvenile Atlantic Salmon and Adult American Shad. Estuaries Coasts 38, 203-214 (2013).
Hammar, L. et al. Hydrokinetic turbine effects on fish swimming behaviour. PLoS One 8, e84141 (2013).
Romero-Gomez, P. & Richmond, M. C. Simulating blade-strike on fish passing through marine hydrokinetic turbines. Renew. Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.051 (2014).
Google Scholar
Yoshida, T., Zhou, J., Park, S., Muto, H. & Kitazawa, D. Use of a model turbine to investigate the high striking risk of fish with tidal and oceanic current turbine blades under slow rotational speed. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 37, 100634 (2020).
Peraza, J. & Horne, J. Conditional probabilistic encounter-impact model for fish-turbine interactions. Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference 15, (2023).
Enstipp, M. R., Grémillet, D. & Jones, D. R. Investigating the functional link between prey abundance and seabird predatory performance. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 331, 267–279 (2007).
Cushing, D. H. & Jones, F. R. H. Why do fish school? Nature 218, (1968).
Larsson, M. Why do fish school? Current Zoology. 58, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/58.1.116
Mayer, P. C. Economic models of fish shoal (school) size: A near comprehensive view of single species shoaling strategy. J. Bioecon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9084-7 (2010).
Google Scholar
Seppälä, O., Karvonen, A. & Valtonen, E. T. Shoaling behaviour of fish under parasitism and predation risk. Anim. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.022 (2008).
Google Scholar
Weihs, D. Hydromechanics of fish schooling. Nature. 241, (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/241290a0
Ligman, M., Lund, J. & Fürth, M. A comprehensive review of hydrodynamic studies on fish schooling. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ad1335
Zhang, Y. & Lauder, G. V. Energy conservation by collective movement in schooling fish. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.90352 (2024).
Google Scholar
Currier, M., Rouse, J. & Coughlin, D. J. Group swimming behaviour and energetics in bluegill Lepomis macrochirus and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. J. Fish Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14641 (2021).
Google Scholar
Marras, S. et al. Fish swimming in schools save energy regardless of their spatial position. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1834-4 (2015).
Google Scholar
Johansen, J. L., Vaknin, R., Steffensen, J. F. & Domenici, P. Kinematics and energetic benefits of schooling in the labriform fish, striped surfperch Embiotoca lateralis.. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08885 (2010).
Google Scholar
de Bie, J., Manes, C. & Kemp, P. S. Collective behaviour of fish in the presence and absence of flow. Anim. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.07.003 (2020).
Google Scholar
Thandiackal, R. & Lauder, G. V. In-line swimming dynamics revealed by fish interacting with a robotic mechanism. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81392 (2023).
Google Scholar
Harvey, S. T., Muhawenimana, V., Müller, S., Wilson, C. A. M. E. & Denissenko, P. An inertial mechanism behind dynamic station holding by fish swinging in a vortex street. Sci. Rep. 12, 1 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ren, K. et al. Numerical investigation on energetically advantageous formations and swimming modes using two self-propelled fish. Ocean Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113288 (2023).
Google Scholar
Deng, J. & Shao, X. ming. Hydrodynamics in a diamond-shaped fish school. J. Hydrodynamics 18, 428–432 (2006).
Wei, C., Hu, Q., Li, S. & Shi, X. Hydrodynamic interactions and wake dynamics of fish schooling in rectangle and diamond formations. Ocean Eng. 267, 113258 (2023).
Partridge, B. L. & Pitcher, T. J. Evidence against a hydrodynamic function for fish schools. Nature, 279, (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/279418a0
Ralph, A. L., Berli, B. I., Burkhardt-Holm, P. & Tierney, K. B. Variability in swimming performance and underlying physiology in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) Vol. 163 (Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology – A Molecular and Integrative Physiology, 2012).
Olsén, K. H., Petersson, E., Ragnarsson, B., Lundqvist, H. & Järvi, T. Downstream migration in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolt sibling groups. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61, 3 (2004).
Barber, I. & Ruxton, G. D. The importance of stable schooling: Do familiar sticklebacks stick together? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 267, (2000).
Ward, A. J. W., Duff, A. J., Krause, J. & Barber, I. Shoaling behaviour of sticklebacks infected with the microsporidian parasite, Glugea anomala. Environ. Biol. Fishes 72, 155–160 (2005).
Przybilla, A., Kunze, S., Rudert, A., Bleckmann, H. & Brücker, C. Entraining in trout: A behavioural and hydrodynamic analysis. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 2976–2986 (2010).
Liao, J. C., Beal, D. N., Lauder, G. V. & Triantafyllou, M. S. The Kármán gait: Novel body kinematics of rainbow trout swimming in a vortex street. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 1059–1073 (2003).
The MathWorks Inc. MATLAB. Preprint at. (2024).
Walter, T. & Couzin, I. D. TRex, a fast multi-animal tracking system with markerless identification, 2D body posture estimation and visual field reconstruction. bioRxiv (2020).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Preprint at (2022). https://www.R-project.org/
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Pinheiro, J. et al. Package nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package (2020).
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).